|
Principles of institutional quality
assurance in Canadian higher education
The following principles have been endorsed by the executive
head of each member of the Association of Universities and Colleges
of Canada.
Each AUCC member institution has a mission statement and objectives
which underpin the development and assessment of its academic
programs. Each university is committed to ensuring that appropriate
standards are achieved and maintained in its programs and that
it is offering a high quality education. To these ends:
Quality assurance and improvement
The institution has in place a formal, approved, transparent
policy committing it to ensuring the quality and continuous improvement
of its academic programs.
Where applicable, the institution is also in compliance with
the requirements of a provincial or regional authority having
responsibility for quality assurance either through that agency's
verification that the institution's quality review policy and
processes meet an agreed standard, or through the agency's own
assessment of the programs offered.
The authority responsible for implementation of the institutional
policy and for action in response to recommendations resulting
from the quality assurance process is clearly identified.
There is a procedure for the regular review of the institution's
quality assurance policy and related processes.
Scope and frequency of reviews
The policy applies to current and planned programs.
The policy is comprehensive in its coverage of all undergraduate
and graduate programs.
The policy applies to all programs whether campus-based or delivered
at a distance, in Canada or across borders.
The full range of the institution's academic programs is subject
to review on a regular cycle.
The policy defines the elements of the program reviews.
The policy includes an appropriate mechanism to review interdisciplinary
programs.
Key characteristics of the quality review
The quality assessment process is based on self-evaluation and
peer review.
The process includes, as a fundamental dimension, the involvement
of external disciplinary experts.
The process involves internal and external stakeholders including
students, faculty, and the administration of the institution,
and may also involve alumni and representatives of the community.
Where accreditation or certification processes exist for certain
professional and other programs, the institution typically participates
in them, and these standards are integrated into the institution's
own quality review processes for these programs.
Information to the public
There is documentation to guide the quality assurance process,
and this documentation is public.
In the interests of transparency and accountability, the results
of the quality assessment are made public.
The policy, related processes and the calendar for assessments
are known within the institution and among external stakeholders
including government and the public-at-large.
Download a pdf of this information here.
|